<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TranquilPhotos.com &#187; Lighting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog/tag/lighting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog</link>
	<description>Photographic concentrated weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Strobes vs Continuous Lights</title>
		<link>http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog/2009/strobes-vs-continuous-lights</link>
		<comments>http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog/2009/strobes-vs-continuous-lights#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continuous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strobe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot more Continuous light modules and from what I hear they were all over PDN this year. I can honestly say that I never thought they would catch on, but I can also see why they would.  Just like not having to worry about learning a Darkroom helped more people use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot more Continuous light modules and from what I hear they were all over PDN this year.</p>
<p>I can honestly say that I never thought they would catch on, but I can also see why they would.  Just like not having to worry about learning a Darkroom helped more people use Digital, I can see how someone may not want to learn lighting to use external lights.</p>
<p>You shoot what you see, you don&#8217;t have to worry about ratios blindly.  It&#8217;s Shoot what you see photography, which is good for some occasions but not all.</p>
<p>What is Continuous Light good for?</p>
<ul>
<li>One or two person Studio Sessions</li>
<li>Product Shots</li>
<li>Short duration photography as they generate a lot more heat</li>
<li>Where power is not a concern</li>
<li>Distance is not great.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t have to try to over power local illumination or the sun.</li>
<li>Different LEDs can be used to provide different color lights without the use of gels</li>
</ul>
<p>What Continuous will not work for</p>
<ul>
<li>Mobile situations &#8212; such as speedlights</li>
<li>Where you have limited power.  Even power packs only have so much voltage.</li>
<li>Large group of people</li>
<li>Strobes are easier to Gel most of the time.</li>
<li>Strobes generate less heat</li>
<li>Small flashes with AA batteries can be mounted/moved just about anywhere.</li>
<li>A small external battery can give you several hours of shooting capability with a speedlight.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are just what popped in my head.  I&#8217;m sure I missed some in both camps.</p>
 <img src="http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=180" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tranquilphotos.com/blog/2009/strobes-vs-continuous-lights/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

